For example:


     APL is A Programming Language conceived by Kenneth Iverson in the
1960's at the IBM Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, NY.

     APL was written to allow designers of the new IBM 360 super
computer of the time to express on paper the algorithms implemented in
the hardware that made up the computer.

     They essentially wrote the computer in APL, before implementing it
in hardware.

     In that sense APL was a hardware programming language, however they
found once the 360 was built, that the language used to design it was
optimum for use on it in many other areas of application.

     Like many programming languages APL deals with numbers and

     It has two rather unique qualities, the first is that rather than
use names for various functions like log and sine, it uses single
characters, and thus needs a special keyboard to enter the special
symbols.  If you have ever seen an APL keyboard, you will probably
remember wondering what the hell that was.

     Second, because it has so many fundamental operators like log and
sine, there is no order of precedence in evaluating expressions.

     In most languages 3 x 2 - 1 would be (3 x 2) - 1 or 5.

     In APL, everything is evaluated from right to left unless there are
parenthesis, so 3 x 2 - 1 would be 3.

     One of the advantages of APL is that it is an interpreter, rather
than a compiled language, so one is presented with an active workspace
on the computer screen that accepts commands, executes them and
remembers them in real time.

     A simple session might go as follows.

     Indented lines are typed by the user, unindented lines are typed by
the computer.
      A <- 3
      A <- A + 2

     The above session shows a number of important things.

     Before A has been assigned anything, it doesn't exist at all, it is
a NOTHING per the opening definitions of a nothing, or a VALUE ERROR per

     The opening definitions define the basic word matrix for the
rest of the proof.

     The opening definition of a nothing is an object with an empty
quality set, it is the object with no qualities.

     In APL, after A has been assigned the number 3 with A <- 3, A
becomes a something, its quality set is no longer empty as it now
contains the number 3.

     Once A has been assigned a number, it retains that number forever
until it is changed again, for example, in the next line by adding 2 to
it and reassigning it to the new number 5.

     The last line where A is typed alone on the line indicates a desire
to see its value, and the number 5 is written.

     In fact any line, no matter how complex, that does not contain an
assignment arrow <-, means that you want the final evaluation of that
line printed out.  Without the assignment <- however, the final result
is not stored in any thing, and the value is lost as soon as it is
printed.  Better to store it in A first then print it out!
     The workspace can be saved at this point and reloaded later to
find A still exists where one last set it.

     A can also be erased, returned to a value error.

     )ERASE A
     The ) symbol at the beginning of a statement means the start of a
system command rather than a mathematical expression.

     For example )SAVE will save the workspace for later retrieval,
)LOAD will reload it back again, and )WSID will print the name of it.

     Numbers come in many forms in APL, they start with the simple
numbers like 3 in the example above.  In that case the 3 is a scalar,
with zero dimensions as we shall see below.
     But A can also be assigned to a set of numbers like so:

     A <- 3 10 5 17
3 10 5 17
     A + 1
4 11 6 18

     In the above example 3 10 5 17 form a 4 element array called a
vector.  Vectors have one dimension, like points on a line, and can be
as long as you like, that is have as many elements as you like including
just 1 or even 0 elements!

     There are a number of operators that work with vectors to help
you handle them.

     First the regular operators like plus and minus work as you would

     A <- 2 4 6 8
     A + 3
5 7 9 11

     A + 3 is shorthand for

     A + 3 3 3 3
5 7 9 11
     A + 1 2 3 4
3 6 9 12
     A + 1 2 3 4 5

     The above shows that you can add a scalar to a vector in which
case the scalar is added to each member of the vector, or you can add
two vectors together, in which case each member is added to the same
member in the other vector.  But we can not add two vectors of
different lengths, its meaningless.

     There are also more sophisticated operators that allow you to sum
up the values of A

     A <- 1 2 3 4

     The construct +/A means put the + between every member of the
vector and the execute the whole line.

     A more interesting example is is x/A which puts a times between
each member and multiplies them all up.

     A <- 1 2 3 4

     Notice in APL times is x and not *.  The * is exponentiation.

     Now here is where you really need to start paying attention, for
without this you won't ever be able to talk about the proof and
scalars in any meaningful way.

     The first thing that needs to be understand is that APL works
with operators and operands.

     Plus, times etc are operators, and numbers are operands.
Operands can also be character strings like "HI THERE" but we
won't be dealing with them for the moment.

     *ALL* operands are called arrays, and all arrays have a shape or a

     There is an operator that allows you to determine the shape and
size of any array, be they scalars, vectors, matrices, cubes or hyper
cubes etc.

     It is written and called after the greek letter RHO, in this
paper we will use the small letter p to represent the RHO operator, as
that is the closest to what a RHO really looks like.  Its called RHO
after RESHAPE which is what it does.

     All operators can be used either monadically or dyadically.

     Monadic use means the operator is on the left and the
operand is on the right.  
     For example -3 is an example of a monadic use of the minus sign.

     Dyadic use means the operator has operands on both the left and the

     For example 2 - 3 is an example of a dyadic use of the minus sign.

    Sometimes the monadic and dyadic use of an operator are very
similar, sometimes they are very different, but usually related in
some way.

    For example monadically *2 means E*2 where E is 2.714281428.

    Dyadically 4*2 means 4 squared.

     RHO also has two uses, depending on whether it is used with one
argument or two.

     With one argument, RHO returns the shape or size of A.

     Shape and size have identical meanings so from now on we will call
it shape.
     A <- 1 2 3 4 5 6

     This says that A has one dimension with 6 elements in it.  That's
like a one dimensional line 6 inches long.

     You know there is only one dimension because only one number was
printed out, so A is a vector with 1 dimension.

     You know that 1 dimension has an extension of 6 6 elements because
its right there in the answer.

     Every dimension has an extension in that dimension even if it is
zero extension.  A line that is zero inches long is still a line and
still has one extension which equals zero.

     An extension of zero does not mean there is NO extension at all!
The extension is still there even if it is zero in length.

     So when you see 6 = pA, you know that A is one dimensional with an
extension of 6 inches, elements, numbers or whatever.

     When used with two arguments as in B p A, RHO reshapes A after the
value of B.

     RHO will fill out the answer with as many numbers taken from
the right side as is necessary to accomodate the left side operand.

     5 p 1
1 1 1 1 1

     6 p 1 2 3
1 2 3 1 2 3

     4 p 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4

     Now the above notation opens a serious question, which is what is
the value of:

    0 p 1 2 3 4

     Well we know that the left hand side tells you two things, how
many dimensions and how many elements in that dimension.

     So because there is just one number on the left, the answer must
be a one dimensional vector, but it has ZERO elements!

    To make it more concrete let's use A again.

    A <- 0 p 6
         <- blank line

     Since A has no elements in it, when you ask for APL to print it
out, it just prints an empty line.  Notice this is not the same thing

     Just because A is an empty vector, doesn't mean it is a nothing.
Its a 'something' with one dimension, and one extension that is zero

     Now of course in the real world, and object that was one
dimension but zero inches long, would be a material nothing, but we
have to be really careful here, because having one dimension, even if
its zero extension, makes it a something in our language, not a

     It has quality, namely shape, even if it has no material existence,
thus it can't be considered a true nothing which has no qualities at
all.  Shape means dimension with extension.  In this case having zero
extension doesn't mean having no shape, thus it isn't a complete nothing
as it still has shape 1 dimension with zero extension.

     One more thing to notice before we move on, it clearly doesn't
matter WHAT is to the right of the RHO if the left is 0, because RHO is
going to take zero elements from the set on the right, and that's zero
elements regardless of what is on the right.

     So the following are all the same 1 dimensional, 0 element

    0 p 1
    0 p 2 3
    0 p 1 2 3 4 5 6
    0 p 0

    In fact when someone wants to create an empty vector they often
just use

    A <- 0 p 0
blank line

     Now you might ask why would anyone want to create an empty
vector?  Well it creates a place holder so that you can then
concatenate things on to it as you collect them.

    For example:

    A <- 0 p 0
blank line

    A <- A, 3

    A <- A, 4
3 4
    A <- A, 2 4 6
3 4 2 4 6
    A <- A, 3 p 7 7 9 8 7
3 4 2 4 6 7 7 9

    Remember APL evaluates from right to left with no precedence,
so 3 p 7 7 9 8 7 is 7 7 9 which is then concatenated onto what A already

     Suppose you tried to concatenate onto B without first setting B to
the empty vector.


    B <- B, 3

     B isn't defined at all, its a true nothing, so you can't add
something to it.

     Say you want to create a two dimensional matrix that is 3 by 4
filled with 1 2 3 4 5.

    A <- 3 4 p 1 2 3 4 5
3 4
1 2 3 4
5 1 2 3
4 5 1 2

    You see, 3 rows, 4 columns filled with 1 2 3 4 5 repeated as many
as necessary to fill it up.

    Say you want to create a cube of 3 by 3 by 2 filled with the numbers
from 0 to 17.

    A <- 3 3 2 p 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
3 3 2
0 1
2 3
4 5

6 7
8 9
10 11

12 13
14 15
16 17

     APL can't print out a cube, so it prints out 3 faces of 3 by 2

     So you can see the power of RHO.

     Now let's take a look at the consequences.

     First let's review what RHO does.

     Used with two arguments it creates an object from data on the
right with shape specified on the left.

     A <- SHAPE p DATA
     A <- 2 3 4 p 3     That's a 2x3x4 cube filled with 3's.

     Used with one argument, RHO returns the shape of the object that
was used to create it.

     A <- 2 3 4 p 3
2 3 4

     So this is our first theorem of importance.

     SHAPE = p (SHAPE p DATA)
     B = p (B p A)

     Now here is the next question.
     What is the shape of the answer that RHO returns?  In other words
what is the shape of the shape of data?

    In the example above pA returned 2 3 4.  What is shape of 2 3 4?

    Well its 3.

    So we have

    A <- 3 4 p 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
    pA         This is the SHAPE of A, its extensions in each dimension.
3 4
    ppA        This is the RANK of A, its number of dimensions.
    pppA       This is always 1.

     Clearly A is a 3 x 4 matrix of 1's.

     So the shape of A is {3,4}.

     We put the {}'s around the shape of an object to signify that it
is the shape we are talking about.  APL itself doesn't do this.
     And the shape of 3 4 is {2}, its a line with 2 elements right?

     And the shape of 2 is {1}, it too is a line with 1 element.
     Now here is where you ask, but 2 is a single number, why is it
considered a vector of one element instead of a scalar?

     Simply because RHO is *DEFINED* to return a vector, it always
returns a vector, it can't return any thing else but a vector.

     But it can return a one element vector or even an EMPTY vector.

     Say we define S to be a scalar, V to be a vector, M to be a
matrix and C to be a cube.

     S <- 3
     V <- 1 p 3
     M <- 1 1 p 3
     C <- 1 1 1 p 3

     We have created four objects above.

     The first is a zero dimensional scalar whose value is 3.

     The second is a one dimensional vector whose value is 3.

     The third is a two dimensional matrix whose value is 3.

     The fourth is a three dimensional cube whose value is 3.


    So what is the difference?


1 1
1 1 1

     The shape returns how many dimensions the object has, and each
element in the shape tells you the number of elements along that
dimension in the object.

     Take a 1 x 1 matrix, it is two dimensional, but has only one
element.  The shape of that one element is {1,1} which means a 1 by 1
or 1 x 1 matrix.

     Take a 1 x 1 x 1 cube, it is three dimensional, but also has only
one element of shape {1,1,1}

     So you see that the number of elements that an object has is not
related to how many dimensions that object can have.

     A vector, matrix or cube can have as many elements as you wish,
including none!

     0 0 0 p 9 is a zero element cube with shape {0,0,0}
       0 0 p 9 is a zero element matrix with shape {0,0}
         0 p 9 is a zero element vector with shape   {0}

     Remember when 0's are on the left of RHO, it doesn't matter
what is on the right.
     What happens when we try to make a zero element scalar?
     Notice we can write the above another way.
     (3 p 0) p 9   is a zero element cube   with shape {0,0,0}
     (2 p 0) p 9   is a zero element matrix with shape   {0,0}
     (1 p 0) p 9   is a zero element vector with shape     {0}
     (0 p 0) p 9   is a ONE  element scalar with shape      {}

     Notice the first three lines are 0 element nothings with some
shape, but the last line is a 1 element something with no shape whose
value equals 9!
     So how do you make a zero element scalar?

     You can't.  A scalar HAS TO HAVE ONE AND ONLY ONE ELEMENT.

     A zero element scalar is a VALUE ERROR.

     So let's talk about the vector and matrix and cube a bit more.

     How many elements total does an object have?

     Well if it is a 2 x 3 x 4 object, it has 24 elements, or 24 cubic
units, or whatever your measure is.

     Since 2 3 4 is just the RHO of the object we can write that the
number of elements in an object is

    A <- B p 1
    N = x/pA = x/B

     Remember that x/B means to multiply all the elements of B
together.  If B is 2 3 4 then 2 x 3 x 4 is 24 elements total in a 2 by
3 by 4 matrix.

     Now let's get tricky.

     We know there are zero elements in a 0 element 1 dimensional

     V = 0 p 6    (6 is irrelevant since only 0 are used.
     x/pV = x/0

     How many elements are there in a matrix with 0 rows and 4 columns.
That's a 0 x 4 matrix.

     M <- 0 4 p 5
0 4
     x/pM = x/0 4 = 0 x 4

     That's right, zero rows and 4 colums makes zero elements total.
Kind of stupid eh?

     So is that a nothing?  No, its not a value error, its a nothing
with two dimensions and SHAPE, namely 0 rows and 4 columns, that
surely is not a nothing.

     But it isn't a lot of something either.

     Say someone gave you a 2 x 2 x 2 piece of gold.  That would be 8
cubic units of gold wouldn't it.  That's a lot of gold.
     The product of the shape is the 'volume' of the item.

     G <- 2 2 2 p GOLD
2 2 2
8    Volume is 8 cubic units of Gold.

     But now say someone gave you a 0 x 2 x 2 piece of gold.  That's 2
units square on a side, but 0 zero units thick.  How much gold would
that be?

     Zero.  Correct.

     G <- 0 2 2 p GOLD
0 2 2
0    Volume is 0 cubic units of gold.
     Now let's say you are a two dimensional flatland creature, you
have no idea about the 3rd dimension, and cubic units is meaningless
to you, but square units means a lot.

     So the 'volume' of things is measured in square units rather than
cubic units.  Yes that's normally called 'area', but in APL its called
volume anyhow which is DEFINED as the product of the shape.

     Say someone gives you a 2 x 2 piece of gold.

     How much gold is that?

     Well it's 2 square units of gold, which is quite a bit, right?

     G <- 2 2 p GOLD
2 2
4    Volume is 4 square units of Gold.

     But say he gives you a 0 x 2 piece of gold.

     How much gold is that?

     G <- 0 2 p GOLD
0 2
0    Volume is 0 square units of gold.

     It's zero square units, and that's no flatland gold at all!

     So what is the difference between a

       0 x 2 x 2 piece of 3 dimenisonal gold and a
           2 x 2 piece of 2 dimensional gold?

     The first is 0 cubic units of 3 dimensional gold which is no
gold, and the second is 4 square units of 2 dimensional gold which is
some gold!

     So we come to our next theorem which is really important, and you
really have to get it, or you just won't get anything beyond this.

     If a physical object has a dimension, it must have non zero
extension in that dimension to order to be a physical something.
Anything with zero extension along any of its dimensions is a physical
nothing with shape.

     So the minute you take a 2 x 2 piece of gold which is a something,
and give it a 3rd dimension, you HAVE to give it non zero extension in
that dimension or it will turn into 0 x 2 x 2 or no gold.

     So if the external physical universe consists of 9 dimensions, as
the string theory boys claim, every one of them HAS to have non zero
extension in them or else the entire universe would disappear into

     Yes APL allows for zero extension objects to exist, they are called
nothings with shape, but ACTUAL hardball existence doesn't allow for
nothings with shape.

     Ok so what about the scalar?

     Well the scalar is a rough case, because it doesn't have the
option of being a nothing with shape, it has to be a something or a
value error.  You can only be a nothing with shape if you have shape!
And having shape means having non zero dimensions.  Since a scalar has
zero dimensions, it has no shape at all.

     A scalar doesn't need to have non zero extension along
all of its dimensions in order to be a something because it
has ZERO dimensions and thus no extensions in which to have
non zero extension.

     Further how do you create a scalar using RHO.  Since its SHAPE is
the empty vector, you have to use an empty vector to create it!

     Notice that 0p0 is an empty vector, remember if there is a 0 on
the left, it doesn't matter what is on the right, 0p6 would have done
just as well, its still 0 elements!

     A <- (0p0) p 4
           <- empty vector, A's shape is zero dimensions
0          <- indicates that pA has zero elements
1          <- is always 1 no matter what

     Notice that the above does not make A empty, it makes
A's SHAPE empty, which makes A a non empty scalar!
     So lets make a table out of this showing everything there is to
know about scalars, vectors, matrixes cubes and hypercubes.

     Formally the correct way to create all these different kinds of
arrays is as follows.

                         Number of           Length of each
                         Dimensions          Extension
     S <- (0 p 0) p 9         0                    {}
     V <- (1 p 5) p 9         1                   {5}
     M <- (2 p 4 5) p 9       2                 {4,5}
     C <- (3 p 3 4 5) p 9     3               {3,4,5}
     H <- (4 p 2 3 4 5) p 9   4             {2,3,4,5}

9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
Hey I will let you figure it out!  H is a hypercube.
     Here is another formal table laying out the p, pp, and ppp of
each of the above arrays.

         S         V         M         C         H
p       {}        {5}      {4 5}    {3 4 5}  {2 3 4 5}  shape
pp       0         1         2         3         4      rank
ppp      1         1         1         1         1      always 1

     The shape has one number for each dimension showing the extension
in that dimension.  Notice the shape of the scalar is empty {}.

     And the rank is how many dimensions an object has.

     Notice the rank of the scalar is 0 because there are 0 dimensions
in the shape {}.
     Notice that the terms small and big refer to the size of the
extension along any dimension.  Since a scalar doesn't have any
dimensions, it has no extensions, and thus the terms small and big do
not apply to a scalar.  Do not confuse having no dimensions with being
small.  Only a non zero dimensional object can be small or big.
     So what have we learned?

     An object can either be a scalar with zero dimensions or a non
scalar with 1 or more dimensions, such as a vector, matrix or cube.

     If an object has one or more dimensions, it MUST have non zero
extension in all those dimension in order to not be a physical nothing.

     If an object is a scalar, it doesn't have dimensions in which to
have extensions, but exists anyhow with only one element.  That one
element however can be as long or as complex as you want.

     PI is a scalar, but is infinitely long and contains an infinite
amount of data.

     One doesn't need dimension to encode data, the use of vectors,
matrixes and cubes are merely a convenience.  All of the data in the
biggest multidimensional matrix you could concieve can all be placed
into a single number in a single scalar.


     Following our usual path, actuality is defined as what is true, and
reality is defined as what we think is true, that is what is real to us.

     It used to be that the reality of people was that the world was
flat, this did not in any way change the actuality, which was that the
world was round.
     It is the purpose of inquiry to align reality with actuality.

     The ultimate question then is what is the nature of the
AllThatIs.  Is it a multidimensional object, or a zero dimensional
     What is the RANK of existence, how many dimensions does it have.

     Which is true?

     0 = pp Actuality or
     0 < pp Actuality ?

     It is an important question.
     From The Proof we have learned that one can not learn with
certainty about anything across a non zero extension in a 
dimension.  Where there is certainty, there is no extension and zero
dimension between learner and learned about.

     So where there is perfect certainty, 0 = pp Actuality.

     This zero dimensional actuality however likes to project multi
dimensional virtual realities, thus we have the following two
equations that sum up existence.

     0  = pp Actuality
     0 != pp Reality